Part of the x3y community

Mortgage Amortization Schedule – Why it is Cleverly Set Up to Work Against You

I get this question all the time. If I have a good mortgage and pay bills on time, why should I even care about taking any further action with my mortgage?
Good question.

The way the bank charges you interest is sophisticated. You may not even realize you are paying more than you have to and this is not your fault.

Banks set up their system so that you end up spending more on your monthly mortgage repayment towards interest rather than principal in the early years. For example, if you have a $1,200 monthly repayment, it common to spend $1,100 in interest and $100 in principal.

You can go directly to bankrate.com and use their mortgage calculator to see how much you are paying in principal and interest each month.

However, did you know you can and have the right to change the situation in your favor each month?

You could end up spending $900 in interest and $300 to principal should you choose to with a little more applied towards your principal payment every other month.

Even an eagle-eye read-through of your bills and your mortgage statement each month will not catch this method.

There is a simple method that will allow you to allocate more of your mortgage principal to you mortgage balance rather than interest. The key is to use the mortgage acceleration method.

You set up a Home Equity Line Of Credit (HELOC) account and draw down just the right amount from your HELOC to pay off your mortgage. Once the mortgage balance is paid down to a certain limit the bank reallocates more of your monthly payment to principal rather than interest.

This may sound confusing but you can search Google on this and learn more about the mortgage acceleration programs

Staying on top of your mortgage finances can sometimes feel like a full-time job.

And most of us already have a lot to deal with. In times like this, it is easy to get tempted by promises to find quick fix solutions that will help you take control of your situation.

By: Neil Venketramen

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Real Estate · July 22nd, 2010 · Comments (0)

What’s Behind the Mortgage Acceleration Phenomenon? Math, Science, Or Science Fiction?

One of the most controversial subjects to hit the information highway in the last few years is the development of equity accelerator programs or the use of software to facilitate an early mortgage payoff. It seems that everyone has an opinion about these new mortgage principal reduction programs as to whether they are a mathematically legitimate and viable method of accelerating the payoff of mortgage and other debt.

The proponents of the mortgage accelerator programs claim that they will enable homeowners to pay off their existing mortgage in a fraction of the normal time by utilizing mathematical formulas or algorithms which direct cash flow and discretionary income to offset the principle and interest associated with conventional mortgage amortization.

Yet the math they are able to demonstrate can be found in a common mortgage amortization calculator.

The opponents contend these programs do nothing that one can’t accomplish on their own and that the cost is, therefore, unjustified.

The most critical commentary seems to come from individuals in the mortgage industry. Are they speaking from a sense of altruism or is their vehemently negative position an inadvertent testament to the effectiveness of mortgage acceleration analysis software?

Still more albeit less aggressive criticism comes from the professional ranks of financial advisors. It is more of a conceptual argument that one should direct their financial resources into investment strategies rather than toward mortgage reduction strategies.

If you are able to earn an 8% return, it would make mathematical sense to grow that account rather than pay off debt at 6%, but does the arbitrage argument assume a higher rate of return on the investment than were likely to see these days? Also, is arbitrage, the process of investing borrowed money, something that the average American family should feel comfortable in doing in a volatile market?

So, all that one may need in the way of validation that these mortgage acceleration software programs work is the volume of protests from those who work on the other side of the balance sheet.

If you look at how these programs work, it becomes clear that it’s not voodoo, magic, or part of the financial bail out plan. It’s just our money paying off our debt. Could we accomplish the same thing ourselves? Possibly so, however, most of us don’t.

The concept of mortgage acceleration is only part mathematical. The balance of the concept is more behavioral in nature.

We all know that, in order to lose weight, we need to stop eating so much and exercise more. Yet there is a billion dollar weight loss industry that is thriving despite this physiological fact.

Perhaps the key to mortgage acceleration software programs is that they show us how to make better financial decisions. Take the concept of virtual interest, for example. If we have a mortgage, we pay virtual interest on everything that we buy. The $5 we spent at Starbucks this morning could have been sent to pay down the principle on our mortgage. Rather, we chose not to do that and so will pay virtual interest on that $5 for the next 20 or 30 years. To our balance sheet, there is no difference between virtual and actual interest.

Had we known that the true cost of that cup of coffee was $30; would we still have bought it? These programs put our normal cash flow into a format that demonstrates the effect of our discretionary spending and forces us to make better buying decisions. They reinforce the good decisions by giving us positive, goal oriented feedback. They negatively reinforce the bad decisions by visibly adding time to our sentence of debt.

Had we all been given a proper financial education, then we wouldn’t need mortgage reduction programs and the points made on either side of the issue would be moot. Instead, we were taught chemistry and algebra and so, the controversy will continue.

By: David Haslett

Tags: , , , , , , ,
Posted in Finance · August 27th, 2009 · Comments (0)